Monday, 24 December 2001
Sunday, 23 December 2001
Monday, 31 December 2001
- Re: Validator choking on ™ (TM)
- Re: Validator choking GoLive generated JavaScript
- Re: Validator choking GoLive generated JavaScript
- Re: Validator choking on ™ (TM)
- Validator choking on ™ (TM)
- Validator choking GoLive generated JavaScript
Thursday, 27 December 2001
Saturday, 22 December 2001
Friday, 21 December 2001
- Re: http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html
- Re: "valid [X]HTML x.x!" icons are Evil
- Re: "valid [X]HTML x.x!" icons are Evil (was Re: Thanks a lot)
Thursday, 20 December 2001
- Re: "valid [X]HTML x.x!" icons are Evil
- Re: "valid [X]HTML x.x!" icons are Evil (was Re: Thanks a lot)
- Re: Your Validator Site
- Re: "valid [X]HTML x.x!" icons are Evil (was Re: Thanks a lot)
- Re: validating comment-Tags
- Re: "valid [X]HTML x.x!" icons are Evil (was Re: Thanks a lot)
- Re: "valid [X]HTML x.x!" icons are Evil
- Re: Your Validator Site
- Re: validating comment-Tags
- Re: Your Validator Site
- Re: validating comment-Tags
- Your Validator Site
Wednesday, 19 December 2001
- validating comment-Tags
- RE: weird validator bug
- RE: weird validator bug
- Re: weird validator bug
- Re: NAME and ID attribute types content model
- weird validator bug
- Re: NAME and ID attribute types content model
- NAME and ID attribute types content model
Monday, 17 December 2001
- checklink:
- Re: "valid [X]HTML x.x!" icons are Evil (was Re: Thanks a lot)
- Re: Validation broken for protected pages
- Re: bug in validator, reproducable
- Re: Validation broken for protected pages
- bug in validator, reproducable
- Bug Report
Friday, 14 December 2001
Wednesday, 12 December 2001
Monday, 17 December 2001
- Re: "valid [X]HTML x.x!" icons are Evil (was Re: Thanks a lot)
- Re: "valid [X]HTML x.x!" icons are Evil (was Re: Thanks a lot)
Sunday, 16 December 2001
Saturday, 15 December 2001
- Re: HTTP error pages
- HTTP error pages
- Re: detected character encoding "upload"
- detected character encoding "upload"
Friday, 14 December 2001
Thursday, 13 December 2001
Wednesday, 12 December 2001
- Re: Validating errors
- Re: Validating errors
- Re: Validating errors
- Validating errors
- Re: Installing a local copy of Validator
- Re: Finding The New Acceptable Ways
- Re: Finding The New Acceptable Ways
- Re: Installing a local copy of Validator
- Re: Finding The New Acceptable Ways
- Re: Thanks a lot
- Installing a local copy of Validator
- Re: Thanks a lot
- Re: Finding The New Acceptable Ways
- Re: Thanks a lot
- Re: Finding The New Acceptable Ways
Friday, 7 December 2001
Thursday, 6 December 2001
Tuesday, 11 December 2001
Friday, 7 December 2001
Tuesday, 11 December 2001
Monday, 10 December 2001
- Re: Thanks a lot
- Re: Thanks a lot
- Re: Thanks a lot
- Re: Thanks a lot
- Re: UTF-8
- Re: Thanks a lot
- Re: Thanks a lot
- UTF-8
- Re: Thanks a lot
Friday, 7 December 2001
- Re: Wrong character encoding detect for XHTML
- Re: Wrong character encoding detect for XHTML
- Re: Wrong character encoding detect for XHTML
- Re: Wrong character encoding detect for XHTML
- Wrong character encoding detect for XHTML
- Re: W3C Validation says it's right, Tidy says it's wrong. Tidy was right.. [part two]
- Re: Thanks a lot
- Re: Euro sign
Thursday, 6 December 2001
- Re: Image not available for HTML 4.01 Strict?
- Re: Thanks a lot
- Re: Image not available for HTML 4.01 Strict?
- Re: W3C Validation says it's right, Tidy says it's wrong. Tidy was right.. [part two]
- Checklink
- Re: small HTML 4.01 validation bug?
- checklink
Tuesday, 4 December 2001
Monday, 3 December 2001
- Question about public identifier
- W3C Validation says it's right, Tidy says it's wrong. Tidy was right.. [part two]
- W3C Validation says it's right, Tidy says it's wrong. Tidy was right..
- Text area facility
- small HTML 4.01 validation bug?
- Thanks a lot
Sunday, 2 December 2001
Tuesday, 4 December 2001
Monday, 3 December 2001
- [Fwd: Question about public identifier]
- Re: use of name and id in XHTML frame element
- Re: [Fwd: "DOCTYPE declaration" - What is the advantage of a this?]
- Re: link validator vs. html validator
- [Fwd: "DOCTYPE declaration" - What is the advantage of a this?]
- running on NT now ok, but had some trouble, cvs - not ok
- Re: BUG report for the HTML Validator
- Re: BUG report for the HTML Validator
- BUG report for the HTML Validator
Sunday, 2 December 2001
Saturday, 1 December 2001
- Re: use of name and id in XHTML frame element
- Re: use of name and id in XHTML frame element
- Re: Question on W3C Validator
- Re: use of name and id in XHTML frame element