- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 18:08:01 +0200
- To: James Ralston <qralston+ml.www-validator@andrew.cmu.edu>
- cc: www-validator@w3.org
On 06.08.01 at 13:46, James Ralston <qralston+ml.www-validator@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote: >I prefer the latter, because I've found that giving people some idea of >the order of magnitude of their errors is a lot more effective at >motivating the worst offenders. Up to this point, to do that, I've >scrolled through the validation results page and counted the errors. It >would be very handy to get the errors back pre-counted. Counting things is what computers do best. :-) We could easily add a count of messages (this is not necessarily the same as "errors") somewhere visible. You could then refer to a line/column number to identify a specific message. We could even add an ID to each message so you can refer directly to it.
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2001 12:42:40 UTC