- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 05:59:45 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- cc: Roman Schechtel <roman@schechtel.de>, www-validator@w3.org
On 06.08.01 at 04:34, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: >Why are we currently using <ul>? Because OL is visually noisy and I'm not entirely convinced it would be a win. OTOH, I'm not entirely convinced a list is the proper form for the output so YMMV. :-) On 06.08.01 at 04:30, Roman Schechtel <roman@schechtel.de> wrote: >However, it is difficult to refer to a particular error when there are >many of them in a document. Life would be much easier if the errors were >numbered. > >That way one could easily say: "Hey, look at error Nr. 5, that's where the >problems come from!" The idea certainly has merit, and the problem should be dealt with somehow. Does anyone have suggestions -- in addition to or instead of making the output a numbered list -- for how the output could be improved?
Received on Monday, 6 August 2001 01:19:05 UTC