Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second

I support this suggestion, as I have eyperienced those misleading
messages caused by a simple typing error in a tag
eg. <TABEL ....
It complains almost everything including </TABLE> and the
cause of the error is such hard to find.

Jochem Heicke

Bryce Nesbitt schrieb:
> 
> The validator first checks attributes, then the element.  This means if I do something
> like:
> 
>         <csobj w="208" h="77" t="Button">
> 
> I get a long series of complaints about each attribute ("w", "h", "t") before
> I find that the validator actually does not understand the <csobj>.  An
> improvement would be to check the element FIRST, and give just one error message.
> 
> I've had trouble getting web page authors to use the validator, because of issues
> like this (spurious error messages -- especially because of valid Javascript).
> A way to be less strict might improve usage.
> 
>                 -Bryce
> 
> 
>        Document type: HTML 4.01 Transitional
> 
>        Line 47, column 30:
>          ...           <p><csobj w="208" h="77" t="Button" cl="images/New ...
>        Error: there is no attribute "H" for this element (in this HTML version) (explanation...)
> 
>        Line 47, column 37:
>          ...         <p><csobj w="208" h="77" t="Button" cl="images/NewFi ...
>        Error: there is no attribute "T" for this element (in this HTML version) (explanation...)
> 
>        Line 47, column 49:
>          ... csobj w="208" h="77" t="Button" cl="images/NewFiles/start_on ...
>        Error: there is no attribute "CL" for this element (in this HTML version) (explanation...)
> 
>        Line 47, column 83:
>          ... " t="Button" cl="images/NewFiles/start_on.gif" ht="images/NewFiles/sta ...
>        Error: there is no attribute "HT" for this element (in this HTML version) (explanation...)
> 
>        Line 47, column 114:
>          ... s/start_on.gif" ht="images/NewFiles/start_off.gif"><a href="index2.htm ...
>        Error: element "CSOBJ" not defined in this HTML version (explanation...)

Received on Thursday, 2 August 2001 17:40:18 UTC