- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 07:05:18 +0200
- To: BjörnHöhrmann <bjoern@hoehrmann.de>
- cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
[ CC because W3C.org is acting wonky these days. ] On 01.08.01 at 04:55, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: >>We ignore unknown parameters completely > >Yes, that's what I am complaining about. Unknown parameters should get >reported to avoid confusion. Agreed. Suggestions for how? I find only inelegant solutions -- like keeping a list of known params -- and it seems like there /should/ be an elegant solution to this problem. :-) >>Waitaminute... > >*argl*! :-) Sorry! I /said/ I was feeling dense... :-) >>We end up requesting a different page and that page happens to be >>invalid? So the extra params aren't affecting _our_ behaviour, it's the >>_lack_ of params that makes the _validated_ server change _it's_ >>«behaviour»? IOW, it's not an error in the Validator -- the error lies >>with the user failing to escape CGI params -- it's just that it would be >>a usefull feature to actually give a warning about it to make the user >>aware that s/he needs to escape these characters? > >We can harldy do that. Complain about invalid parameters is fair enough. «We can hardly do...» What, exactly? Suggest escaping characters in the URI? Why not? What /should/ we do then? There is no way we can tell the difference between «;» and «;», if you see my dilemma? :-) >http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b70e0ab.6398430%40news.bjoern.hoehrmann.de My German-fu is a little weak, but I think I got the gist of it. For the hapless user in question: I apologize most humbly for the failure and will endeavour mightily to correct my erring ways. Just as soon as I figure out what they are and how to fix it. :-) IOW, it's clear the Validator needs to be «fixed» in some sense or way. I'm just not quite up to the point, as yet, where I grok the specifics of the «How» and the «Why» (much less the «When»; as Gerald is AWOL the next couple of weeks). [ BTW, is everyone not seeing my left/right double angle quotation marks ] [ (or whatever UNICODE calls them), but some weird chars instead? I did ] [ some testing with various newsreaders and found that those fancy quote ] [ marks worked cross-platform, but by the way it looks in replies it may ] [ be my mailer is using a different translation table from my newsreader ]
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2001 01:05:46 UTC