Tuesday, 28 August 2001
Friday, 31 August 2001
- Re: Charset "iso-10646-1"
- Re: validators hang when referred from private address space
- Re: Charset "iso-10646-1"
Thursday, 30 August 2001
Friday, 31 August 2001
- Re: validators hang when referred from private address space
- Re: No link back to page being validated in new design
- Re: An image for XHTML 1.1
- Re: validators hang when referred from private address space
- Re: Validator output should include number of errors...
- Re: Charset "iso-10646-1"
- Re: Charset "iso-10646-1"
- Re: Unsupported character set
- Re: No link back to page being validated in new design
- Re: No link back to page being validated in new design
- Re: No link back to page being validated in new design
- Re: No link back to page being validated in new design
- Re: No link back to page being validated in new design
- No link back to page being validated in new design
Thursday, 30 August 2001
Wednesday, 29 August 2001
- Validator output should include number of errors...
- Re: Charset "iso-10646-1"
- Re: validators hang when referred from private address space
Tuesday, 28 August 2001
Friday, 24 August 2001
Monday, 27 August 2001
Friday, 24 August 2001
Thursday, 23 August 2001
- Re: smaller image
- smaller image
- Re: Error numbering
- Re: #validator IRC channel
- Re: #validator IRC channel
- Re: Help please - validator failure
- Re: #validator IRC channel
- Help please - validator failure
- #validator IRC channel
- Re: Error numbering
- Re: Ancher address in logo for validated page and link checker
- Re: DTD 4.01 for ignoring & in CGI URL
- Re: Error reporting (Re: Error numbering)
- Re: Unsupported character set
Wednesday, 22 August 2001
Thursday, 23 August 2001
- Problems with TRs on WebTV? (was: meta question)
- Re: add local file to W3C HTML Validation Service (at UK Mirror Service)?
- Re: Help!
- Re: Tar error message
- Re: w3 validator
- Re: meta question
Wednesday, 22 August 2001
Monday, 20 August 2001
- Re: Bug : Validator doesn't "see" the </em> end tag
- Re: Bug : Validator doesn't "see" the </em> end tag
- Re: Bug : Validator doesn't "see" the </em> end tag
- Bug : Validator doesn't "see" the </em> end tag
- Re: w3 validator
- Re: This page validates without a <body> tag!!
Friday, 17 August 2001
Thursday, 16 August 2001
Sunday, 19 August 2001
Saturday, 18 August 2001
Friday, 17 August 2001
- Re: List
- Re: XML Schema
- Re: Xhtml /CSS validator- umlaut problem
- Re: checklink:
- Re: Neither!
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: Xhtml /CSS validator- umlaut problem
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: Xhtml /CSS validator- umlaut problem
- Re: Neither!
- Re: Neither!
Thursday, 16 August 2001
- Re: Xhtml /CSS validator- umlaut problem
- Re: Xhtml /CSS validator- umlaut problem
- Re: Xhtml /CSS validator- umlaut problem
- Re: http://validator.w3.org/
- Re: Help!
- Re: bug: <FORM name= ...> in HTML 4.01 Transitional
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: checklink:
- Re: Xhtml /CSS validator- umlaut problem
- Re: DTD problem, or validator problem?
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Fwd: Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: Xhtml /CSS validator- umlaut problem
- Re: http://validator.w3.org/
- Re: bug: <FORM name= ...> in HTML 4.01 Transitional
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: Xhtml /CSS validator- umlaut problem
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
- Re: Xhtml /CSS validator- umlaut problem
- Re: when using validator is not sensible
Tuesday, 14 August 2001
Thursday, 16 August 2001
Monday, 13 August 2001
Friday, 10 August 2001
Thursday, 9 August 2001
- http://validator.w3.org/
- when using validator is not sensible
- Help!
- add local file to W3C HTML Validation Service (at UK Mirror Service)?
- List
Thursday, 16 August 2001
Wednesday, 15 August 2001
Tuesday, 14 August 2001
Sunday, 12 August 2001
Saturday, 11 August 2001
Friday, 10 August 2001
- Re: ISO-10646 in HTML 4.01
- Re: validation problem with nested lists
- Re: validation problem with nested lists
- validation problem with nested lists
- Re: ISO-10646 in HTML 4.01
- Re: ISO-10646 in HTML 4.01
Thursday, 9 August 2001
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
Thursday, 9 August 2001
- Re: Anonymous CVS-access failed
- Re: Anonymous CVS-access failed
- Anonymous CVS-access failed
- Re: Shaming compaines into improving their HTML
- Re: ISO-10646 in HTML 4.01
- Re: ISO-10646 in HTML 4.01
- ISO-10646 in HTML 4.01
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
Monday, 6 August 2001
- Re: Error reporting (Re: Error numbering)
- Re: Error numbering
- Ancher address in logo for validated page and link checker
- Error reporting (Re: Error numbering)
- Re: Misspelling in "added charsets" of check -perl-script?
- Re: Guide to wrap needed
- Re: Error numbering
- Re: Error numbering
- Error numbering
Friday, 3 August 2001
Wednesday, 1 August 2001
Saturday, 4 August 2001
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
Friday, 3 August 2001
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: lazy idea
- Re: lazy idea
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
Thursday, 2 August 2001
- Re: lazy idea
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: lazy idea
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: Suggestion: "allow extra attributes" flag
- Re: lazy idea
- Re: Suggestion: "allow extra attributes" flag
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Suggestion: "allow extra attributes" flag
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
Wednesday, 1 August 2001
Thursday, 2 August 2001
- Suggestion: Check elment first, attribute second
- Re: Warn about unknown parameters
- Re: Warn about unknown parameters
- Re: XHTML 1.1 icon
Wednesday, 1 August 2001
- Re: Warn about unknown parameters
- Re: Warn about unknown parameters
- Re: no attribute "TARGET"?
- XHTML 1.1 icon
- no attribute "TARGET"?
- [www-validator] <none>
- RE: checklink: Error 500: Timeout
- Re: checklink: Error 500: Timeout
- RE: checklink: Error 500: Timeout
- Re: checklink: Error 500: Timeout
- Re: charset parameter
- Re: checklink: Error 500: Timeout
- Re: Warn about unknown parameters
- Re: Double guillemets [was: Re: Warn about unknown parameters]
- checklink: Error 500: Timeout
- Double guillemets [was: Re: Warn about unknown parameters]
- Re: Warn about unknown parameters
- Re: Warn about unknown parameters
- Re: Warn about unknown parameters