- From: <pdf@bizfon.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 13:46:51 -0400
- To: david@braverman.org
- cc: www-validator@w3.org
My comments were not meant as a flame! I am stating the truth. This issue has been brought up several times over the past few months, and the first time I have ever seen anyone from the W3C even acknowledge it was this morning when Steve Kimberley replied that it will be fixed next week. Yes, I'm thankful for the validator service. But to be honest, this should have been fixed long ago. Alot of people follow the W3C's guideline for adding the image to their page, which first suggests to link directly to their copy of the image. I'll recognize them when it actually gets fixed, and someone DOES take the time to maintain the graphics. -Pete "David Braverman" <david@braverman.org> on 09/22/2000 10:51:07 AM Please respond to david@braverman.org To: www-validator@w3.org cc: (bcc: Peter Foti) Subject: RE: "Valid HTML 4" image Whoa, dude! The flame was totally unnecessary. These people volunteer their time to maintain the validators and graphics. Let's recognize them for that instead of trashing them for not volunteering more.
Received on Friday, 22 September 2000 13:46:34 UTC