www-validator@w3.org from October 2000 by date

Saturday, 28 October 2000

• Re: UTF-8 with Unicode line separator and BOM Terje Bless
• Re: XHTML DTD doesn't validate? Terje Bless

Sunday, 29 October 2000

• W3C HTML 4.01 Check Kevin M Stange
• Re: Problems with the use of TABLE Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Problems with the use of TABLE Jette Nielsen

Saturday, 28 October 2000

• Re: Just a funny note Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: feature suggestion: fragment context selection Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: User-Agent choice suggestion Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: Should Relative URL in format 'http:g/' validate Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: User-Agent choice suggestion Konstantin Riabitsev

Friday, 27 October 2000

• Re: User-Agent choice suggestion Terje Bless
• Re: Should Relative URL in format 'http:g/' validate Terje Bless
• Re: feature suggestion: fragment context selection Terje Bless
• feature suggestion: fragment context selection Todd Fahrner
• Re: User-Agent choice suggestion Bjoern Hoehrmann
• User-Agent choice suggestion Konstantin Riabitsev

Wednesday, 25 October 2000

• Re: new validator Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Liam Quinn
• Re: new validator Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document James Ralston
• Re: Should Relative URL in format 'http:g/' validate Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: new validator Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Liam Quinn
• Re: new validator Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Terje Bless
• Re: new validator Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Terje Bless
• Re: Should Relative URL in format 'http:g/' validate Terje Bless
• Re: new validator Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Should Relative URL in format 'http:g/' validate Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: new validator Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Liam Quinn
• new validator Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Karl Dubost
• Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Liam Quinn
• Re: Should Relative URL in format 'http:g/' validate Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: Should Relative URL in format 'http:g/' validate Terje Bless
• Re: Should Relative URL in format 'http:g/' validate Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Terje Bless
• Re: Should Relative URL in format 'http:g/' validate Terje Bless
• Should Relative URL in format 'http:g/' validate Paul Gammans
• Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Karl Dubost

Tuesday, 24 October 2000

• Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Liam Quinn
• Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Terje Bless
• Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Karl Dubost
• Re: [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Bjoern Hoehrmann
• [Bug] XHTML Strict Minimal document Karl Dubost

Monday, 23 October 2000

• Re: Validator can't find my DTD...? Bjoern Hoehrmann

Sunday, 22 October 2000

• Validator can't find my DTD...? darkgiraffe@hushmail.com

Monday, 23 October 2000

• help MOLLY SAGER
• Re: XML decl and XHTML Pooja Mehar
• Re: XHTML DTD doesn't validate? David J N Begley
• Re: UTF-8 with Unicode line separator and BOM Masayasu Ishikawa

Sunday, 22 October 2000

• Just a funny note Frederic G. MARAND
• Re: XHTML DTD doesn't validate? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• XHTML DTD doesn't validate? David J N Begley
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Terje Bless

Saturday, 21 October 2000

• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: Problem validating XHTML documents named .xhtml Aaron Nielsen
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Christian Smith
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Christian Smith
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Christian Smith
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: error in the validator Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: Support for ISO/IEC 15445:2000 Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: Minor Problem With File Upload Feature Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: Minor Problem With File Upload Feature Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: Problem validating XHTML documents named .xhtml Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: I think I found a bug in the upload validator Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: Problem validating XHTML documents named .xhtml Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: Test case for XML-mode of HTML validator. Gerald Oskoboiny

Friday, 20 October 2000

• I think I found a bug in the upload validator Paul Philion

Saturday, 21 October 2000

• Re: [PATCH] Labeled XML fix Gerald Oskoboiny
• Re: [PATCH] Entity encoding in URI output Gerald Oskoboiny

Friday, 20 October 2000

• Re: Document type: unknown Terje Bless
• Document type: unknown Philip TAYLOR

Wednesday, 18 October 2000

• Re: UTF-8 with Unicode line separator and BOM Terje Bless
• Re: tab not conventional William Loughborough
• Re: tab not conventional Masayasu Ishikawa

Tuesday, 17 October 2000

• tab not conventional William Loughborough
• Re: UTF-8 with Unicode line separator and BOM Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: UTF-8 with Unicode line separator and BOM Terje Bless
• Re: UTF-8 with Unicode line separator and BOM Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: UTF-8 with Unicode line separator and BOM Terje Bless
• Re: Problem validating XHTML documents named .xhtml Terje Bless
• Error messages (was: Validator problem) Terje Bless
• RE: Validator problem Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: Validator problem Terje Bless
• Re: Validator problem Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Validator problem psp@mindpass.com

Monday, 16 October 2000

• Re: Validation ok, but still there is a problem!!! Terje Bless
• Validation ok, but still there is a problem!!! POWELL Olivier
• UTF-8 with Unicode line separator and BOM Christian Ottosson
• Problem validating XHTML documents named .xhtml Aaron Nielsen

Thursday, 12 October 2000

• Re: Validating XML on the Validator - Logo please? Terje Bless
• Re: Prominence of Validation Confirmation Message... Terje Bless

Tuesday, 10 October 2000

• Re: [PATCH] DOCTYPE Override pdf@bizfon.com
• [PATCH] DOCTYPE Override Terje Bless
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Terje Bless
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Terje Bless

Monday, 9 October 2000

• Re: tar: directory checksum error Terje Bless
• Re: Base element Terje Bless
• Base element Hugo Haas
• tar: directory checksum error rday@harlequin.co.uk

Friday, 6 October 2000

• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Terje Bless
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default pdf@bizfon.com
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Terje Bless
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default pdf@bizfon.com
• Re: sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Terje Bless
• Re: win32 binary Bjoern Hoehrmann
• win32 binary Julian Burgess

Wednesday, 4 October 2000

• Re: hex FFFE at the start of UTF-16 stream Masayasu Ishikawa
• Re: [XHTML-L] Re: hex FFFE at the start of UTF-16 stream Simon St.Laurent
• Re: hex FFFE at the start of UTF-16 stream Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: hex FFFE at the start of UTF-16 stream Masayasu Ishikawa
• hex FFFE at the start of UTF-16 stream Jan Egil Kristiansen
• sugggestion: HTML 4.01 as default Martin Honnen
• Re: elements other than HTML on web pages Terje Bless
• Re: elements other than HTML on web pages pdf@bizfon.com

Tuesday, 3 October 2000

• elements other than HTML on web pages John Sankey
• Re: Minor Problem With File Upload Feature Terje Bless
• Re: .html and nothing else Gerald Oskoboiny
• [PATCH] Labeled XML fix Terje Bless
• [PATCH] Entity encoding in URI output Terje Bless

Monday, 2 October 2000

• Re: Minor Problem With File Upload Feature Karl Ove Hufthammer
• Re: Minor Problem With File Upload Feature Shane P. McCarron
• Re: error in the validator Terje Bless
• Re: Minor Problem With File Upload Feature Terje Bless
• Minor Problem With File Upload Feature Hourann Bosci
• error in the validator Joern Heissler
• Re: .html and nothing else Terje Bless
• Re: .html and nothing else Shane P. McCarron
• Re: "Valid HTML 4" image Karl Dubost
• Re: .html and nothing else Terje Bless
• Re: .html and nothing else Shane P. McCarron

Saturday, 30 September 2000

• Re: Running mirror validator mtjo

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 October 2000 05:45:54 UTC