- From: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 22:14:52 +0100
- To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
On 02.11.00 at 13:48, Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org> wrote: >One problem with this though is that there may be some 401s that are a >result of the draft being (temporarily) in member space, and others that >are actually links to other member-internal resources that need to be >reported. Y'all seem awfully hung up on the fact that you use the link checker to check links in W3C material... Try focusing on making it work right in a generic (non-W3C specific) fashion and __fix_your_working_methods__! :-) >How about an option that says "ignore 401s for resources that have the >same URI prefix as that being checked" or something? And this would help, how? Are we talking about links from a TR to an included file like, say, a DTD here? This is impossible to distinguish from a bad link to a protected area because the link checker's ESPs[0] aren't yet fully enough advanced to know which files you'll be moving to a Public area and which will get left behind[1]. A 401 is a 401, try checking your documents in a Public "staging" area before publication instead of trying to hodge-podge around fundamental aspects of HTTP. Simply make it a part of the routine to check out a copy (y'all _do_ have these things under VC, right?) in "Staging" and run the checker on that. This could probably even be automated... I think the main problem was false positives though. Patrick said he was getting a gazillion 401 warnings in Member space. This sounds like internal links to Appendices, DTDs, and the like. Having to pick up a few leftover 401s o Member areas afterwards has got to be better then a few hundred false 401s to components of the same comound document. [0] - "Extra Sensory Powers" for the non-BeeGees fans. :-) [1] - I'll give you "relative links", but not "same URI prefix". Ok, I'm a pedant, so sue me. :-) -- "I don't want to learn to manage my anger; I want to FRANCHISE it!" -- Kevin Martin <brasscannon@bigfoot.com>
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2000 17:32:33 UTC