- From: Markus Kramer <kramer@molgen.mpg.de>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 08:15:54 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-validator@w3.org
All started when I looked at my (validated) HTML-page from a Macintosh... (I had no character set denoted.) I assumed Isolatin-1. The Macintosh assumed it's own charater set and displayed a mess. So I put a META-tag in my document to denote the character set: <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=...."> When I tried "charset=isolatin-1" nothing happend. When I tried "charset=ISO-8859-1" The Macintosh displayed every character correct! I was happy. Now I want to make a suggestion for improving the validator: The validator did not report the wrong name (isolatin-1) because he will report *any* string as a 'character set'. For example <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=mumble"> will result in Document Checked ... Character encoding: mumble ... I propose that the validator provides a (link to a) list of common character sets, which I have looked for but could not find. The validator could produce a warning, if someone (like me) puts in "mumble" for a charset. Like: Your Character Encoding "mumble" was not found in our <a ...>list of common character sets</a>. Please check your spelling or notify us of a new common character set. I found in this newgroup an old (1996) discussion about isolatin-1 beeing the default character set of the web (which was considered a bad thing). As the Macinotosh does not assume isolatin-1 beeing the default, the validator could issue a warning, if there is no character set given. Markus
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2000 15:06:31 UTC