- From: Markus Kramer <kramer@molgen.mpg.de>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 08:15:54 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-validator@w3.org
All started when I looked at my (validated) HTML-page from a
Macintosh...
(I had no character set denoted.)
I assumed Isolatin-1.
The Macintosh assumed it's own charater set and displayed a mess.
So I put a META-tag in my document to denote the character set:
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=....">
When I tried "charset=isolatin-1" nothing happend.
When I tried "charset=ISO-8859-1" The Macintosh displayed every
character correct!
I was happy.
Now I want to make a suggestion for improving the validator:
The validator did not report the wrong name (isolatin-1) because he will
report *any* string as a 'character set'.
For example
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=mumble">
will result in
Document Checked
...
Character encoding: mumble
...
I propose that the validator provides a (link to a) list of common
character sets, which I have looked for but could not find.
The validator could produce a warning, if someone (like me) puts in
"mumble" for a charset.
Like:
Your Character Encoding "mumble" was not found in our <a ...>list of
common character sets</a>.
Please check your spelling or notify us of a new common character
set.
I found in this newgroup an old (1996) discussion about isolatin-1
beeing the default character set of the web (which was considered a bad
thing).
As the Macinotosh does not assume isolatin-1 beeing the default, the
validator could issue a warning, if there is no character set given.
Markus
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2000 15:06:31 UTC