- From: Stout <mstout@xnet.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 21:39:59 -0500
- To: "Christian Smith" <csmith@barebones.com>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
Thanks for the note. The book -- XML by Example says: "By convention, HTML elements in XML are always uppercase. " "By convention XML elements are frequently written in lowercase." If XHTML validation is going to use lowercase for HTML elements, I can deal with that. But I'd wish the "convention" was as strict as XML. Regards, pat stout mstout@xnet.com -----Original Message----- From: Christian Smith <csmith@barebones.com> To: Stout <mstout@xnet.com> Cc: www-validator@w3.org <www-validator@w3.org> Date: Saturday, July 15, 2000 9:06 PM Subject: Re: XHTML validation >On Saturday, July 15, 2000 at 3:32 PM, mstout@xnet.com (Stout) wrote: > >> Is there a reason the XHTML 1.0 Transitional validation process will kick >> out errors with uppercase tags <TR></TR>, but will validate the code if >> tags are lower case <tr></tr>? > >Yes, there is. > >-- >Christian Smith | csmith@barebones.com | http://web.barebones.com > >He who dies with the most friends... Is still dead! > >
Received on Saturday, 15 July 2000 22:32:06 UTC