- From: Einar Westermann <einar.westermann@online.no>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:18:58 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
I don't think that is what he means, actually. How could the validator output be used to impress site visitors? The validator output might have had a prominent "no errors found" message, to distinguish it more easily from a result page with error listings. Surely this is a usability issue pertaining to the validation service. (But a minor issue, I think. The coloured icon is easy to spot.) Einar Kynn Bartlett wrote: > > At 11:43 PM -0500 7/12/00, ClintonGallagher wrote: > ><!-- At 3:43 PM -0500 7/12/00, ClintonGallagher wrote: > ><!-- >I would like to see "No Errors Found" confirmation > ><!-- >displayed as the very first text on the page, > ><!-- >displayed very large, displayed very bold. > Ahhhh, _I_ see the problem here! > > You're looking for validation as an _award_ of some kind, and thus > you want the results to be PROUDLY DISPLAYED for all to see! You > view this as a flashy feather in your hat, and thus you want THE > W3C'S APPROVAL (in big letters, even!) on your work! > > See, the problem here is that the W3C validator isn't meant to be > that. It's not a brag server. It's just a tool, to make sure your > HTML works and is valid. > > As such, it does the job just fine, based on the purpose. The purpose > isn't to impress your site visitors; it's a tool for _you_. The > current output is sufficient for -that- purpose.
Received on Thursday, 13 July 2000 07:17:37 UTC