- From: Leedsnet <info@leedsnet.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 15:47:12 -0500 (EST)
- To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
>I agree, but I'm unsure if this can, or even should, be reported by the >Validator as I suspect this is perfectly valid in SGML. I agree with all that you wrote, and like you, feel that the validator must report exactly the result of parsing the mark-up with an SGML and nothing but that. My guess is that this fell out of some feature of the language intended to ease typing. I cannot, though, believe that it was deliberate. The best I can hope for is that it is documented on the parser site. Ben. -- Leedsnet - The information resource for Leeds and the West Riding <URL:http://www.leedsnet.com/>
Received on Sunday, 30 January 2000 15:52:02 UTC