- From: Yuu Morita <yuu@os.rim.or.jp>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 16:45:49 +0900
- To: <www-validator@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
I think that the interpretation of W3C validator is wrong of me. Without a part of elements (e.g. SCRIPT), can't include meta characters in texts. In short, <img src="foo.gif" alt="<![CDATA[ Jack & Jill ]]>" /> is valid, however, this markup isn't expected for author. Should be written <img src="foo.gif" alt="Jack & Jill" />. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian Smith" <csmith@barebones.com> To: <www-html@w3.org> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 12:22 AM Subject: CDATA in attribute values > I this valid? > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> > <head> > <title>Untitled</title> > <meta name="generator" content="BBEdit 6.0.1" /> > </head> > <body> > <img src="foo.gif" alt="<![CDATA[ Jack & Jill ]]>" /> > > and even this > > <img src="foo.gif" alt="<![CDATA[ <p>'Jack & Jill'</p> ]]>" /> > > and this > > <img src="foo.gif" alt="<?xml <p>'Jack & Jill'</p> ?>" /> > > </body> > </html> > > The W3C validator seems happy with this and my reading of the Annotated > XML seems to indicate that this is valid. > > -- > Christian Smith | csmith@barebones.com | http://web.barebones.com > > He who dies with the most friends... Is still dead! > >
Received on Friday, 1 December 2000 02:45:54 UTC