Re: glossary

On 01.04.00 at 15:47, Fred Hapgood <hapgood@pobox.com> wrote:

>There should be a glossary on this site.

This may be just be me being stupid, but what exactly would the glossary
contain? Not negative to the idea, you see, but I'm not sure I understand
it. Care to elaborate?

Received on Thursday, 13 April 2000 17:55:38 UTC