- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 23:28:01 -0700
- To: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
- Cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
At 07:59 AM 10/09/1999 +0200, Terje Bless wrote: >Anything else that is needed? More information like page size, download >times, link checking and spell checking? Many of these features are provided by sites such as websitegarage.com and so on, but typically do them very poorly. (Page size and download time are included with Bobby, BTW.) Spell checking would need to be rather configurable; in fact, it might be a reasonable use of META or LINK to specify a dictionary with a given page for spellchecker benefits. I don't know if any work has been done toward this goal, though. Ideally, things like the LANG attribute should become references to URIs that give formal machine-readable syntax, meaning, and pro- nunciation definitions for each language, rather than relying on a constant set to be maintained separately. Of course, this is now way off topic for www-validator so I'll stop. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ Catch the web accessibility meme! http://aware.hwg.org/
Received on Saturday, 9 October 1999 02:37:20 UTC