- From: Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 21:40:56 -0500
- To: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
- Cc: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 09:28:25PM +0100, Terje Bless wrote: > [ Braindump: apologies if it's a bit hasty ] > > Looking over the DOCTYPE guessing code recently, it occurs to me that this > is really ugly. I'm tempted to remove it, but that would significantly > impact the validators useability for certain things and documents. However, > this could have been worked around as a side-effect of a feature on the > TODO list. If the validator let you specify a DOCTYPE to use on the FORM, > you could use it to either override an existing DOCTYPE (this is what's on > the TODO list) _or_ to specify a DOCTYPE for documents lacking one. > > I haven't looked at this specifically, but I /think/ this is an easy > feature to add. Does anyone have opinions on whether this is good enough to > justify killing the DOCTYPE guessing code? You want to chime in here > Gerald? Sounds good to me. Once we have a form that allows people to select a document type, we can probably just make it default to HTML 4.0 Transitional and get rid of all the hairy doctype-guessing code. -- Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org> +1 617 253 2920 System Administrator http://www.w3.org/People/Gerald/ World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 1999 21:41:00 UTC