- From: Brian Gilkison <gilkison@one.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 19:42:54 -0400
- To: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>, <cyberstation@swift.com>
At 03:47 PM 6/18/1999 , Kynn Bartlett wrote: >At 01:23 AM 6/18/1999 , IE Cyberstation wrote: >>Is there any chance of an installable NT version of Validator, or >>anything else like it? > >Just install linux on a local box and try that, easier than >porting to NT. :) Why does everyone keep lambasting this idea? Are you saying NT users write better HTML and therefore have no need to validate their HTML? :) With the most recent changes to the source code, the validator runs as well as it runs on Linux; as far as porting goes, Bjorn Hoehrmann (who has posted here before) got the original script to work on NT unchanged (albeit, he did change the paths for $sp, $sgmlstuff, etc. for his system), and he identified only three lines that needed to be changed to get the script to work under NT AND Win95: 482: $command = "$codeconv $sp -f$temp -E0 $xmlflags $catalog $decl"; 486: open( CHECKER, "| $command - >$temp.esis" ) 500: s/\+$//; which looks like the same changes could be made to the original script without altering the output... Bjoern was more than happy to share this information with me, and after verifying the httpd.conf for Apache on my NT server, the script runs flawlessly for me as well. Brian Gilkison > Brian Gilkison | http://w3.one.net/~gilkison/ < > gilkison@one.net | finger for PGP Public key < > < > The ablilty to speak does not make you intelligent. < > -- Qui-Gon Jinn -- Star Wars I - The Phantom Menace <
Received on Friday, 18 June 1999 19:43:31 UTC