Re: doctype placement

At 08:27 PM 26/07/99 -0400, Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Liam Quinn wrote:
>
>> This has the unfortunate side effect of allowing unrecognized DOCTYPEs to
>> go by without an error message while SP assumes HTML4.dtd.
>
>Sorry, I don't fully understand this.  Can you give some examples to
>illustrate this?

When you use

DOCTYPE html HTML4.dtd

in your catalog and try to validate a document with an unrecognized DOCTYPE
such as

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//FOO//DTD FOO 99.0//EN">

or

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//w3c//dtd html 3.2 final//EN">

SP will assume HTML4.dtd without issuing an error message.  (At least this
is how my locally hacked SP behaves.  I don't think it's from anything I
changed.)

-- 
Liam Quinn

Received on Monday, 26 July 1999 20:43:17 UTC