- From: Terje Bless <link@tss.no>
- Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 00:04:53 +0100
- To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
- cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org>
On 05.12.99 at 21:51, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: >>Error: could not get "/TR/xhtml1/DTD/strict.dtd" from "www.w3.org" >>(reason given was "Found") > >'Found' is Status 200, so wheres the problem? "Found" is 302; "OK" is 200. The Validator (or rather nsgmls) is probably barfing on the 302 which www.w3.org is returning; probably related to the XHTML 1.0 recall and imminent rerelease. I don't /think/ this is related to the latest code changes in the "check" CGI program, but you never know. I don't have time to cook up a fix right now -- and I'd have to wait for Gerald in any case -- but if he doesn't get to it by tomorrow night I'll try to make time to look at possible fixes (if there are any that don't involve recompiling nsgmls or modifying www.w3.org configuration!) so at least those running local copies can get XHTML support back. As a wild guess, the URI that validator.w3.org has for the XHTML Strict DTD is wrong and www.w3.org is redirecting requests to the right location. If that's the case, it's a simple matter of pointing the validator at the right URI. That could be the aftermath of the addition of configuration files in the Validator (it may for some reason be unable to parse a config file and is fetching all DTDs remotely), but I don't think that change has landed on the live site yet.
Received on Sunday, 5 December 1999 18:03:34 UTC