- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:43:21 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28428 Michael Benjamin <mbb448@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #2 from Michael Benjamin <mbb448@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Michael[tm] Smith from comment #1) > Thanks for taking time to reporting this but the validator is behaving as > intended and correctly according to the HTML spec. > > The HTML spec defines the content model of the option element with this > requirement: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/forms.html#the-option-element > "If the element has no label attribute: Text that is not inter-element > whitespace" > > See the "Content Model" subsection at the URL above. Thank you for the response. However, I'm not sure what you're saying is correct. First, the language in the spec doesn't seem clear or definitive. Second, and more importantly, all examples and tutorials from reputable sources (including W3C) use OPTION in DATALIST without the LABEL attribute. Every single one of these code blocks fails to pass validation. These DATALIST examples are all meant for teaching. All fail validation. https://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/Elements/datalist https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/datalist http://www.sitepoint.com/creating-autocomplete-datalist-controls/ http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_datalist.asp http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/html5-datalist/ http://blog.teamtreehouse.com/creating-autocomplete-dropdowns-datalist-element Of course, I am open to the possibility that despite all these examples, I am still wrong. If so, please advise the correct way to write the code in the pages above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 10 April 2015 16:43:23 UTC