- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:51:04 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25104 --- Comment #8 from David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> --- (In reply to David Carlisle from comment #7) oops. > > In text/html parsing things are as usual rather more murky. I got that part right:-) > > This means for example that if you want to put SVG in the annotation-xml you > need to use encoding application/xhtml+xml because then the html parser sees > <svg> and automatically puts things back in foreign content in svg namespace > and things work. If you put any SVG-related value for the encoding the > elements will be parsed as unknown elements in the MathML namespace. I got that part wrong: <svg> is also recognised as svg in MathML (foreign content parsing) However it is still basically true that in text/html there are only really two useful values for encoding, text/html and application/xhtml+xml. Any other value has the same effect as not having the encoding attribute at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 21 March 2014 09:51:06 UTC