- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:37:33 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24799 --- Comment #3 from Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> --- (In reply to Andrea Rendine from comment #2) > [[The IDL attribute text must return a concatenation of the contents of all > the Text nodes that are children of the title element (ignoring any other > nodes such as comments *or elements*), in tree order. On setting, it must > act the same way as the textContent IDL attribute.]](title) What possible relevance does that have to the behavior of the validator? When you give a document to the validator to check, it is impossible for that document to ever have a title element that contains any child elements. > If you are right, then tell me what kind of element could ever be inside > <title>. Or <textarea>, for what is the matter. You filed this bug against the validator. That question has zero relevance to the behavior of the validator. If you're curious about it, file a bug against the spec or something. For the purposes of documents you check with the validator, the no elements can ever be a child of <title> or <textarea>. Again the statement you cite above has absolutely no relevance to the behavior of the validator. So I don't know why you want to continue a discussion about this here. > Or the 'text' IDL attribute is required to return something different than > the actual title of the document (i.e. the one shown in the browser's > window/tab)? First off, the browsers' 'text' IDL attribute implementation > does not seem to honour the requested behaviour. Or the sentence "Text nodes > that are children of the title element (ignoring any other nodes such as > comments *or elements*)" is meant to be completed with the sentence > "actually everything inside a <title> is text, except for comments (but it > is not stated)". Again, you filed this bug report against the validator. But I've told you already there's no bug in the validator here. So at this point I have no idea what else you expect me to do in response to this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 21:37:34 UTC