- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:04:56 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24801
Bug ID: 24801
Summary: <option> content model
Product: Nu Markup Checker
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: General
Assignee: mike+validator@w3.org
Reporter: master.skywalker.88@gmail.com
QA Contact: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
Just tried to validate a document with a <option> element.
The syntax for the specific fragment was as follows:
<select>
<option label="Opel" value="opel"></option>
<option label="Audi" value="audi" />
</select>
The second option (Audi) has a label and a value, so according to the specs it
admits an empty content model as well as end tag omission. I use the XHTML
syntax which is allowed in HTML (though it has no effect).
The response from the validator is error. More precisely
Self-closing syntax (/>) used on a non-void HTML element. Ignoring the slash
and treating as a start tag.
Which is somehow confusing, as in this structure the option element is
effectively treated as void (it cannot have both label+value and content).
In fact when validating the same document as XHTML, the validator flags
nothing. If the problem is in using the self-closing syntax in a non-void
element, then the element is non-void as both HTML and XHTML (the validation
for the latter does not take into account only well-formedness) and XHTML
validation must report it accordingly.
If, on the contrary, there's a bug in the validator not recognizing the void
element, then it's HTML validator which must be corrected. It's the same issue
as "<menuitem> content model" that I sent some weeks ago (still unresponded).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 15:04:57 UTC