- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:11:20 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22223 --- Comment #5 from jc ahágama <ahangama@gmail.com> --- I understand now. Thank you for explaining so clearly. My fault. My problem has been that I still use HTML-Kit that has no choices of encoding types. I suspect the new ruling will upgrade from SHOULD to MUST forcing files like what I write (and all Western European pages) to be larger, unnecessarily taking up precious bandwidth. I think Latin Basic and Latin-1 Supplement can both go as safe single-byte if the first 32 characters of the latter are prohibited or windows-1252 allowed instead. Anyway, I put the shown file into Notepad and saved it as utf-8 to get the passing page. Thank you. And thanks for telling me to use the NU page which is friendlier: http://hathvenibalavegaya.com/index.htm <== utf-8 (20,038 bytes) http://hathvenibalavegaya.com/indexOld.htm <== windows-1252 (18,633 bytes) I beg the great technocrats to allow windows-1252 for the sake of the poor, like those living in Sri Lanka, and the public network that has lot of Western European documents. <-- My proposed patch of penny's worth. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2013 20:11:21 UTC