- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 16:18:59 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22741
Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gregg@kellogg-assoc.com
--- Comment #3 from Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> ---
It's true that much of the ReSpec output could be rewritten in plain RDFa Lite,
but not the critical ordering of authors and editors; this requires using the
@inlist attribute.
It seems rather arbitrary to naturally validate RDFa 1.1 Lite, and call other
RDFa content invalid. This perpetuates the notion that one is "better" than the
other, which just isn't the case. Ideally, when seeing an RDFa 1.1 attribute,
or combination of attributes, the validator could automatically switch to 1.1
mode, or at least signal that the content might be valid RDFa 1.1 and make it
easy to redirect to the proper validator mode.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 21 July 2013 16:19:00 UTC