- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:43:54 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20766
--- Comment #3 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> ---
(1) A validation counterexample: http://tinyurl.com/bfwfjwf
In the counter example (1), then
* @lang has been deleted (actually: replaced with @data-lang)
* <noscript> (which is invalid in XHTML5) has been added.
# Result: It validates.
# The fact that <noscript> is accepted means (despite the weird
non-acceptance of the @lang attribute) that it is the
HTML-conformance rules that are active, despite the XML parser.
(2) A counter-counterexample: http://tinyurl.com/akwuz2r
In the counter-counterexample (2), then
* Same code as in (1) is used, EXCEPT ...
* … EXCEPT that there is an non-well-formed <hr>
# Result: It doesn't validate due to the non-closed <hr>
# The fact that it doesn't validate despite using a HTML5 preset
is because it nevertheless is the XML parser that is used.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 02:43:59 UTC