- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:43:54 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20766 --- Comment #3 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> --- (1) A validation counterexample: http://tinyurl.com/bfwfjwf In the counter example (1), then * @lang has been deleted (actually: replaced with @data-lang) * <noscript> (which is invalid in XHTML5) has been added. # Result: It validates. # The fact that <noscript> is accepted means (despite the weird non-acceptance of the @lang attribute) that it is the HTML-conformance rules that are active, despite the XML parser. (2) A counter-counterexample: http://tinyurl.com/akwuz2r In the counter-counterexample (2), then * Same code as in (1) is used, EXCEPT ... * … EXCEPT that there is an non-well-formed <hr> # Result: It doesn't validate due to the non-closed <hr> # The fact that it doesn't validate despite using a HTML5 preset is because it nevertheless is the XML parser that is used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 02:43:59 UTC