- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:15:52 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20307 --- Comment #7 from Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Don't use http://validator.w3.org/ > > I'm a little shocked by the obviousness your statement implies. > > This is the first time I hear about this state of http://validator.w3.org/ > Please tell me if I'm living in an ivory tower, but I don't know anyone > who's using http://validator.w3.org/nu/ or even advocate its use (few use > validator.nu though). Yeah, we need to do a better job of getting the word out. > A lot of questions come to my mind, for example, why is there no public or > official note in this? Because I've not been able to get consensus for some others about it. > What are the future plans for > http://validator.w3.org/? The current validator backend at the URL will eventually be retired and moved to http://validator.w3.org/classic or somewhere. And the validator.nu backend will be moved from http://validator.w3.org/nu/ to replace it and become the new http://validator.w3.org/ > Are there any? I didn't do an in-depth search, but > the impact of this information appears so to be so big that it should be > easily discoverable. Again, I need to do a better job of getting the word out on this. > Well, I'll start to use and advocate http://validator.w3.org/nu/ from now on. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 12:15:53 UTC