- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 06:37:24 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12400 Shai Berger <shai@platonix.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED URL|http://webkeys.platonix.co. |http://webkeys.platonix.co. |il/show/si1452/ |il/layouts/show/system/si14 | |52/ See Also| |https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Pub | |lic/show_bug.cgi?id=13502 Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #2 from Shai Berger <shai@platonix.com> --- Since this bug was filed, several things changed. One of them is the page URL (updated). Another is that the issue was discussed in #13502 (added as "see also"), where it was concluded that both the use case (a combined character with separate styling for the separate parts) and the implementation (a text run starting with a combining character) are valid; further, they have always been valid. According to comment 6 there (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13502#c6), the validator's behavior is intentional and implements charmod-norm; according to the later discussion, charmod-norm does not apply to HTML. No change to the visible HTML spec was needed to fix this (charmod-norm was never referenced in the first place), but a comment to this effect was added to the document source. So -- in the first case, where text runs do begin with combining characters, the validator's behavior is not conforming to the HTML5 spec or any normative reference. In the second case, where a combining character follows a zero-width character, I'd expect a warning not because it violates a spec -- but because it makes no sense. Following the resolution of #13502, I changed the referenced web application to produce text runs that begin with combining characters, and now it gets all these warnings from the validator. Viewing the source of the page does not show the relevant characters in red -- they are all in orange (as entity references); this strengthens the claim that the warning comes from the validator and not the HTML parser. Thanks, Shai. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 21 April 2013 06:37:27 UTC