- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:59:22 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15831 --- Comment #2 from Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com> 2012-02-03 15:59:21 UTC --- What I don't get is that my document is arguably more compliant with W3C specifications than any of the other documents that validate just fine. If someone were to ask me, "if I were to follow W3C best practices as much as possible," what would I tell them---wouldn't it be to make your document HTML5 compliant *and* XML compliant? Why is it, then, that the documents that most closely follow W3C recommendations are the last ones to validate correctly on the W3C validator? And I still don't understand why it's so hard to validate---XML is not a new technology by any stretch of the imagination. Shouldn't documents that most closely follow W3C recommendations be the first ones to validate properly? Isn't HTML5 with XML compliance better than HTML5 without XML compliance? -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 15:59:28 UTC