- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:13:11 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6449
--- Comment #3 from Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> 2009-01-23 11:13:11 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > is this used anywhere? Standardized anywhere?
>
> The DTDs for many versions of HTML, including all four flavors of HTML 2.0,
> HTML 3.2, HTML 4.01, and XHTML 1.1 all include this attribute for the HTML
> element.
Indeed, didn't know about that one. I just checked the spec for HTML4.01, which
specifies that the VERSION attribute is deprecated as it duplicates the info
present in the DOCTYPE declaration:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#h-7.3
So maybe what we can do is:
* if there is a DOCTYPE declaration (or override), use that
* else
+ if there is a html VERSION attribute,
use that as a fallback and output a warning stating that
DOCTYPE declaration are the prefered identification method
+ else use the default fallback document type
Will have to ping the HTML WG to check that this is sound, but I guess this is
feasible indeed.
thanks!
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 11:13:25 UTC