- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:13:11 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6449 --- Comment #3 from Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> 2009-01-23 11:13:11 --- (In reply to comment #2) > > is this used anywhere? Standardized anywhere? > > The DTDs for many versions of HTML, including all four flavors of HTML 2.0, > HTML 3.2, HTML 4.01, and XHTML 1.1 all include this attribute for the HTML > element. Indeed, didn't know about that one. I just checked the spec for HTML4.01, which specifies that the VERSION attribute is deprecated as it duplicates the info present in the DOCTYPE declaration: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#h-7.3 So maybe what we can do is: * if there is a DOCTYPE declaration (or override), use that * else + if there is a html VERSION attribute, use that as a fallback and output a warning stating that DOCTYPE declaration are the prefered identification method + else use the default fallback document type Will have to ping the HTML WG to check that this is sound, but I guess this is feasible indeed. thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 11:13:25 UTC