- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:56:34 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6458 Summary: different results received, depending on validation method Product: Validator Version: 0.8.4 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: check AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: gmsalvatore@yahoo.com QAContact: www-validator-cvs@w3.org Dear W3C, I receive different responses from W3C's validation service depending on which method I choose to validate my HTML code. If I use the "Validate by File Upload" I receive: This document was Tentatively checked as HTML 4.01 Transitional Result: Tentatively passed, 2 warning(s) If I use "Validate by Direct Input" I receive: This document was successfully checked as HTML 4.01 Transitional! Result: Passed I have attached the file I am validating. Please let me know which results are the ones I should consider correct. I am an online student at the University of Phoenix, and your results as affecting my grades. My instructor, who is checking my work by using your "Validate by File Upload" method, receives 2 warning messages on my HTML code, and is penalizing me points based on these results. I am checking my work by using your "Validate by Direct Input" method, which tells me I have no errors or warnings, in fact, that my code has "passed" and I can include a W3C icon on my Web page because of this high-level result. Could you please explain to me why we receive two different results when checking exactly the same HTML code? Thank you, Jerry Salvatore -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 13:56:43 UTC