- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:14:23 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6296 --- Comment #12 from Dean Edridge <dean@dean.org.nz> 2009-01-03 16:14:23 --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > I don't see how that is relevant. > > If it is so obvious, Sorry, I wasn't suggesting it was obvious, just trying to come up with an algorithm. I was just a bit concerned over how the validator.w3.org and the validator.nu work together, that's all. :-) but it looks like it's coming together well. > you could provide an obvious patch? Well, if you can show me how to set up the validator on Ubuntu or windows XP (I've tried before, but with mixed results) I'll have a go at writing a patch for the next bug I find :) Keep up the good work -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 3 January 2009 16:14:33 UTC