- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:00:42 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6534 Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> 2009-02-06 20:00:41 --- (In reply to comment #2) > The Faq is not correct either. > <a href="foo.cgi?chapter=1§ion=2©=3&lang=en">Test</a> > is perfectly valid Saying it is valid doesn't make it so. ampersands are a bother for anyone writing HTML. We all deal with it. > however the url does not need to be encoded. yes, it does. Look for "ampersand url" in your favorite search engine and you'll get the explanation in thousands of ways. > If I am mistaken, please give me an example[...] <a href="foo.cgi?chapter=1&section=2&copy=3&lang=en">... -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 6 February 2009 20:00:53 UTC