- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:35:32 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6125 --- Comment #5 from Dean Edridge <dean@dean.org.nz> 2008-09-30 04:35:31 --- (In reply to comment #4) > The specification is fine. > > It says the comments end with "--" followed by ">", and there could be white > spaces in between. > > Which means if there is "--" but not followed by ">", it should not be > considered as the end of the comment and the parser should continue looking for > end of comments... > > In another word, from the specification, if there are non-white space > characters in between "--" and ">", > it is not the end of comments and should > not be considered illegal codes. The spec is both HTML and XHTML, meaning that the vocabulary will/can be parsed by both HTML and XML parsers. The HTML5 spec has been developed to have as little as possible differences between HTML and XHTML. The sequence "--" is a fatal error in XML which is perhaps why the editors of the spec decided to make it non-conforming in HTML as well. > > At least the majority browsers allow the codes... That's not really a good reason, there may be other situations where it doesn't work correctly. > > If there is no restriction on "--" followed by ">", then I could understand the > problem, but since there is already a definitive restriction that "--" must be > followed by ">" (with white spaces allowed in between), then all the arguments > above impose more restrictions not specified in the specifications... > > > Thanks > If people disagree with what the spec says or don't understand the rational for decisions such as these, they are welcome to post comments on the: public-html-comments@w3.org mailing list. If anyone wants to subscribe to this list, just follow this link: http://lists.w3.org/#public-html-comments and you'll see the options. Also, when replying on bugzilla you're supposed to click the "reply" link along side the last posters name, and not use the "Additional Comments:" section. That was my mistake earlier, sorry. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2008 04:36:10 UTC