- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:20:18 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4848 ------- Comment #4 from link@pobox.com 2008-01-17 08:20 ------- Just a minor stylistic note; saying the DOCTYPE is “broken” is needlessly obtuse. Rather, say that the DOCTYPE is “Inconsistent”, has a “mismatch” or something along those lines. Be specific, without getting verbose, and summarize the explanatory text from below in the message heading.
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 08:20:26 UTC