- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:16:28 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6298
Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ot@w3.org
--- Comment #2 from Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> 2008-12-17 15:16:27 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Or you could list both HTML5 and XHTML5 in the "Document Type" list.
I thought of doing that indeed. That'd work. I got mixed message as to whether
it is a good idea to use the “XHTML5” name however, as far as I can tell it's
unclear what the best name is. Any pointer to what the currently accepted best
term is?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2008 15:16:38 UTC