[Bug 5080] forbidden caused by themself

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5080

           Summary: forbidden caused by themself
           Product: LinkChecker
           Version: 4.3
          Platform: All
               URL: http://validator.w3.org/checklink?url=http://developer.a
                    pple.com/internet/safari/faq.html
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: checklink
        AssignedTo: ville.skytta@iki.fi
        ReportedBy: Siramizu@gmail.com
         QAContact: www-validator-cvs@w3.org


I just visit the faq for developers on apple.com,
there are some links to check html/css & also link checker
I clicked, bug the results said:

>http://validator.w3.org/check/referer
>    What to do: The link is forbidden! This needs fixing. Usual suspects: a missing index.html or Overview.html, or a missing ACL.
>    Response status code: 403
>    Response message: Checking non-public IP address disallowed by link checker configuration
>    Line: 444
>http://validator.w3.org/
>    What to do: The link is forbidden! This needs fixing. Usual suspects: a missing index.html or Overview.html, or a missing ACL.
>    Response status code: 403
>    Response message: Checking non-public IP address disallowed by link checker configuration
>    Line: 441

suddenly I remember that yesterday I was added two links to check html & css
just now, it reports to me two broken links on my gs.rimy.org

>http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer
>    What to do: The link is forbidden! This needs fixing. Usual suspects: a missing index.html or Overview.html, or a missing ACL.
>    Response status code: 403
>    Response message: Checking non-public IP address disallowed by link checker configuration
>    Line: 36
>http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer
>    What to do: The link was not checked due to robots exclusion rules. Check the link manually.
>    Response status code: (N/A)
>    Response message: Forbidden by robots.txt
>    Line: 39 

that's not my mistake.

Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2007 14:15:46 UTC