W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator-cvs@w3.org > May 2007

validator/htdocs/dev/tests 4476-svg_nodoctype.svg,NONE,1.1 xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.xhtml,NONE,1.1 index.html,1.76,1.77

From: Olivier Thereaux via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 18:30:52 +0000
To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Hl7z2-0001YR-Aw@lionel-hutz.w3.org>

Update of /sources/public/validator/htdocs/dev/tests
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv5942

Modified Files:
	index.html 
Added Files:
	4476-svg_nodoctype.svg xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.xhtml 
Log Message:
test cases for well-formed xml docs

--- NEW FILE: 4476-svg_nodoctype.svg ---
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"/>
<!-- this is a really, really minimal SVG document. No XML declaration, no doctype -->


Index: index.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/validator/htdocs/dev/tests/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.76
retrieving revision 1.77
diff -u -d -r1.76 -r1.77
--- index.html	30 Apr 2007 14:34:06 -0000	1.76
+++ index.html	7 May 2007 18:30:50 -0000	1.77
@@ -407,8 +407,23 @@
   <h3 id="well-formed">Docs that should be Well Formed</h3>
 <p>well formed but no doctype. The validator could mark them as well formed, but not mention validity?</p>
       <ul>
-            <li><a href="../../check?uri=http://impressive.net/people/gerald/2000/10/18/test-staroffice-doc.xml;ss">XML output from OpenOffice 5.2</a>
-              ("Build/Tag number OpenOffice605"), many namespaces</li>
+            <li><a href="../../check?uri=http://impressive.net/people/gerald/2000/10/18/test-staroffice-doc.xml;ss">validate</a> - 
+              <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://impressive.net/people/gerald/2000/10/18/test-staroffice-doc.xml;ss">with v.w.o</a> - 
+               <a href="http://impressive.net/people/gerald/2000/10/18/test-staroffice-doc.xml">View</a>:
+              XML output from OpenOffice 5.2
+              ("Build/Tag number OpenOffice605"), many namespaces
+            </li>
+
+            <li><a href="../../check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/4476-svg_nodoctype.svg;ss">validate</a> - 
+              <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/4476-svg_nodoctype.svg;ss">with v.w.o</a> - 
+               <a href="http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/4476-svg_nodoctype.svg">View</a>:
+              Very minimal SVG document, no document type.
+            </li>
+            <li><a href="../../check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.xhtml;ss">validate</a> - 
+              <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.xhtml;ss">with v.w.o</a> - 
+               <a href="http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.xhtml">View</a>:
+              XHTML document without doctype, served as XML.
+            </li>
       </ul>
 
       <h3 id="encodings">Various Encodings</h3>

--- NEW FILE: xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.xhtml ---
<html>
  <head>
    <title>xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.html</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>This is a simple bogus HTML doc with neither a doctype nor
    an xmlns attribute on its root element.
    </p>
  </body>
</html>
Received on Monday, 7 May 2007 18:30:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:02:22 UTC