- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 01:41:26 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4346 ot@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|W3C online validator doesn't|Update user's manual - we |valid to its own current |use css 2.1 by default |recommendation by default. | ------- Comment #3 from ot@w3.org 2007-03-26 01:41 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Why would you use CSS 2.1 as the default at this point? At this point 2.0 is > the current recommendation? CSS 2.1 is generally considered as an errata to CSS2, and in particular, is closer to actual implementations than CSS 2.
Received on Monday, 26 March 2007 01:41:29 UTC