- From: Olivier Thereaux via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 09:03:12 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/validator/htdocs/dev/tests In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv8219 Modified Files: index.html Added Files: sgml-nodoctype-syntaxnotok.html sgml-nodoctype-syntaxok.html xml-nodoctype-notwf.xml xml-nodoctype-wf.xml Log Message: adding a number of test cases for documents without doctype. sgml or xml, well-formed or not --- NEW FILE: sgml-nodoctype-syntaxok.html --- <foo> --- NEW FILE: xml-nodoctype-notwf.xml --- <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <foo bar=quz /> <zog>&& &a<zo/G> --- NEW FILE: sgml-nodoctype-syntaxnotok.html --- <foo> <a href="12" trget=2>hello</>>& &&a> Index: index.html =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/validator/htdocs/dev/tests/index.html,v retrieving revision 1.78 retrieving revision 1.79 diff -u -d -r1.78 -r1.79 --- index.html 31 May 2007 02:32:14 -0000 1.78 +++ index.html 26 Jun 2007 09:03:09 -0000 1.79 @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ <li><a href="#invalid">Invalid documents</a> <ul> <li><a href="#invalid_misc">Miscellaneous invalid docs</a></li> + <li><a href="#invalid_nodoctype">Missing Doctype</a></li> <li><a href="#nonconform">DTD-Valid but not conformant</a></li> <li><a href="#invalid_bug">Documents that are invalid, which the validator passes as OK</a></li> </ul> @@ -299,12 +300,6 @@ <h3 id="invalid">Invalid Documents</h3> <h4 id="invalid_misc">Miscellaneous invalid docs</h4> <ul> - <li> - <a href="../../check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.html;ss">validate</a> - - <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.html;ss">with v.w.o</a> - - <a href="http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.html">view</a>: - XHTML, no DOCTYPE, no xmlns (thus invalid) - </li> <li><a href="../../check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-bogus-element.html;ss">validate</a> - <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-bogus-element.html;ss">with v.w.o</a> - <a href="xhtml1-bogus-element.html">view</a>: @@ -372,6 +367,7 @@ <a href="http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/errors_sorting.smi">view</a>: SMIL 2.0 with bogus xmlns, xml ill-formedness and bogus elements (used to test sorting of errors) </li> + </ul> <h5>Various often-invalid site</h5> @@ -383,7 +379,33 @@ <li><a href="../../check?uri=http://www.netscape.com/">Netscape</a></li> <li><a href="../../check?uri=http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210.xml">XML 1.0</a></li> </ul> - +<h4 id="invalid_nodoctype">Missing Doctype</h4> +<ul> + <li> + <a href="../../check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.html;ss">validate</a> - + <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.html;ss">with v.w.o</a> - + <a href="http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.html">view</a>: + XHTML, no DOCTYPE, no xmlns (thus invalid) + </li> + <li> + <a href="../../check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xml-nodoctype-notwf.xml;ss">validate</a> - + <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xml-nodoctype-notwf.xml;ss">with v.w.o</a> - + <a href="http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xml-nodoctype-notwf.xml">view</a>: + XML, no DOCTYPE, not well-formed (marked as invalid - FIXME) + </li> + <li> + <a href="../../check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/sgml-nodoctype-syntaxok.html;ss">validate</a> - + <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/sgml-nodoctype-syntaxok.html;ss">with v.w.o</a> - + <a href="http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/sgml-nodoctype-syntaxok.html">view</a>: + SGML-ish document without html root. Served as text/html. No DOCTYPE. Correct SGML syntax. Would pass as well-formed XML if it were XML... + </li> + <li> + <a href="../../check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/sgml-nodoctype-syntaxnotok.html;ss">validate</a> - + <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/sgml-nodoctype-syntaxnotok.html;ss">with v.w.o</a> - + <a href="http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/sgml-nodoctype-syntaxnotok.html">view</a>: + SGML-ish document without html root. Served as text/html. No DOCTYPE. Bogus SGML syntax. + </li> +</ul> <h4 id="nonconform">DTD-Valid but not conformant</h4> <p>For those, we will need to change the message, or hordes of SGML zombies will come down upon us ;)...</p> <ul> @@ -407,22 +429,30 @@ <h3 id="well-formed">Docs that should be Well Formed</h3> <p>well formed but no doctype. The validator could mark them as well formed, but not mention validity?</p> <ul> + <li> + <a href="../../check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xml-nodoctype-wf.xml">validate</a> - + <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xml-nodoctype-wf.xml">with v.w.o</a> - + <a href="http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xml-nodoctype-wf.xml">view</a>: + Basic XML document, well formed. No doctype. Currently checked only for xmlwf. Passes. + </li> + <li><a href="../../check?uri=http://impressive.net/people/gerald/2000/10/18/test-staroffice-doc.xml;ss">validate</a> - <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://impressive.net/people/gerald/2000/10/18/test-staroffice-doc.xml;ss">with v.w.o</a> - <a href="http://impressive.net/people/gerald/2000/10/18/test-staroffice-doc.xml">View</a>: XML output from OpenOffice 5.2 - ("Build/Tag number OpenOffice605"), many namespaces + ("Build/Tag number OpenOffice605"), many namespaces. Currently checked only for xmlwf. Passes. </li> <li><a href="../../check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/4476-svg_nodoctype.svg;ss">validate</a> - <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/4476-svg_nodoctype.svg;ss">with v.w.o</a> - <a href="http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/4476-svg_nodoctype.svg">View</a>: - Very minimal SVG document, no document type. + Very minimal SVG document, no document type. Currently checked only for xmlwf. Passes. </li> + <li><a href="../../check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.xhtml;ss">validate</a> - <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.xhtml;ss">with v.w.o</a> - <a href="http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/dev/tests/xhtml1-missing-doctype-and-xmlns.xhtml">View</a>: - XHTML document without doctype, served as XML. + XHTML document without doctype, served as XML. Fallback to XHTML 1.0, and invalid. </li> </ul> --- NEW FILE: xml-nodoctype-wf.xml --- <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <foo />
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 09:03:19 UTC