- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 06:30:42 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=199 ot@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME Target Milestone|0.7.3 |0.8.1 ------- Comment #8 from ot@w3.org 2007-08-06 06:30 ------- Just added a link to the PEAR library into the API documentation. As for whether to give actual code bits to access the API, I have to admit: * I 've never see it done (checked a number of APIs like flickr, they all detail their API and give a list of libraries that bind to it) * I don't know how to do it without actually writing a library and showing the code, which I believe would be too verbose for the documentation. given the above, and although I do understand Terje's points, I'm closing as WORKSFORME.
Received on Monday, 6 August 2007 06:30:44 UTC