- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:11:08 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=785 ------- Comment #7 from rubys@intertwingly.net 2007-04-19 12:11 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > Many people conditionally serve XHTML with the application/xhtml+xml mime type > > as there are browsers (most notably Lynx and IE) which do not support this MIME > > type. > > Do you know whether most of such techniques have specific URIs for the > application/xhtml+xml and text/html representation? Most of the ones that I'm aware of use a variation of http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/03/19/dive-into-xml.html, so no. Including me. http://validator-test.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.intertwingly.net%2Fblog%2F&charset=&doctype=&ss=1&group=0 Note: I'm *not* expecting the validator at this point to support HTML5. I was, however, expecting it to support XML.
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 12:11:23 UTC