- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:26:24 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3448
ot@w3.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |LATER
------- Comment #1 from ot@w3.org 2006-07-21 02:26 -------
The nesting scenario you describe is indeed non conformant (as explained in
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#prohibitions ) but if you look at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.9 in the XHTML specification, you will see an
explanation of why constraints regarding *any* nesting depth cannot be
expressed in the formal grammar (DTD) used by XHTML 1.0, and therefore it can
not be (in)validated.
I am setting this issue as "Later", knowing that this is the job for a
conformance checker, not a mere validator.
Received on Friday, 21 July 2006 02:26:43 UTC