http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1500 ------- Comment #4 from link@pobox.com 2006-08-15 06:32 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > The only normative reference is the HTML5 working draft: I'll... reserve judgement on the normative weight of WHAT WG specifications. > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#authors-using-html That seems actively incompatible with existing practice. Are you sure you understand what "<!DOCTYPE html>" actually means in an SGML document instance? Do documents produced according to that specification really validate as HTML 4.01?Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2006 06:32:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:02:18 UTC