- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:24:22 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=891 roth@visualclick.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED ------- Comment #2 from roth@visualclick.de 2006-04-25 10:24 ------- Thank you for the clarification. On submission time, I obviously was misled by the wording of the CSS 2.1 spec: "An at-rule consists of everything up to and including the next semicolon (;) or the next block, whichever comes first.", where I construed 'everything' to mean just that. >But for the moment, CSS doesn't yet say how to treat this particular example. This is a somewhat unfortunate state (at least for implementors) in general, as for several other cases that do not match the generic grammar as well there *are* rules for how to recover (cf. CSS 2.1, 4.2, "Unexpected end of style sheet." and "Unexpected end of string.").
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 10:24:31 UTC