- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:22:54 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=891 bert@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Comment #1 from bert@w3.org 2006-04-25 09:22 ------- The intention of the generic grammar and the parsing rules is to allow additional @-rules in the future, should the need arise. Those @-rules must all be of the form ATKEYWORD S* any* [ block | ';' S* ] (1) However, "@chars [.-;abc];" *isn't* of that form. The non-terminal "any" cannot contain a semicolon and square brackets must be paired; those two requirements cannot be met by the example. There is no way to match that input to the grammar, therefore the input isn't an invalid @-rule, it simply isn't CSS. There are voices that say that eventually CSS should specify exactly how to parse any stream of bytes, so that every UA does exactly the same, no matter how little the input looks like CSS. But for the moment, CSS doesn't yet say how to treat this particular example. I think the task of the validator is to say that this input is invalid (of course), but how it recovers from the parsing error is mostly arbitrary.
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 09:23:03 UTC