- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 13:19:20 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1399 ------- Additional Comments From hsivonen@iki.fi 2005-05-23 13:19 ------- > [[ > This is a free service that helps check the validity of Web documents in HTML, XHTML and other > formats. (_More info_). > ]] Looks good to me, except I'd like to qualify "validity" as "DTD validity". That way it does not look like a generic English word and those who don't know what a DTD is have more incentive to follow the "more info" link and find out. > "This is a free service that helps check standards conformance in Web documents. > This service does not check for full conformance." I don't like the idea of substituting "validity" with "conformance" at all, because the validator is not a conformance checker.
Received on Monday, 23 May 2005 13:19:25 UTC