- From: Olivier Thereaux via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:03:02 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/validator/share/templates/en_US
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv22022
Modified Files:
warnings.tmpl
Log Message:
Reverting to version 1.4
Version 1.5 was a re-ordering of the warning messages, putting the warning message about "no doctype found" before "doctype fallback in effect", where that would be more natural.
On second though, I think the two should actually not appear in the same results page, since the "no doctype found" message already mentions that it falls back to a given doctype. Will look into implementing that instead.
Index: warnings.tmpl
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/validator/share/templates/en_US/warnings.tmpl,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -d -r1.5 -r1.6
--- warnings.tmpl 1 Mar 2005 16:58:05 -0000 1.5
+++ warnings.tmpl 1 Mar 2005 17:03:00 -0000 1.6
@@ -142,33 +142,6 @@
</p>
</dd>
</TMPL_IF>
-<TMPL_IF NAME="W16">
- <dt id="W16">No DOCTYPE Found! Falling Back to <TMPL_VAR NAME="W16_dtd" ESCAPE="HTML">.</dt>
- <dd>
- <p>
- A DOCTYPE Declaration is mandatory for most current markup languages
- and without one it is impossible to reliably validate this document.
- I am falling back to "<TMPL_VAR NAME="W16_dtd" ESCAPE="HTML">" and will attempt to
- validate the document anyway, but this is very likely to produce
- spurious error messages for most non-trivial documents.
- </p>
- <TMPL_IF NAME="opt_verbose">
- <TMPL_INCLUDE NAME="doctype_spiel.tmpl">
- <p>
- The W3C QA Activity maintains a <a
- href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html">List of
- Valid Doctypes</a> that you can choose from, and the <acronym
- title="Web Design Group">WDG</acronym> maintains a document on
- "<a href="http://htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/doctype.html">Choosing
- a DOCTYPE</a>".
- </p>
- <TMPL_ELSE>
- <p>
- So what should I do?
- <a href="docs/help.html#faq-doctype">Tell me more...</a>
- </p>
- </TMPL_IF>
-</TMPL_IF>
<TMPL_IF NAME="W09">
<dt id="W09"><code>DOCTYPE</code> Fallback in effect!</dt>
<dd>
@@ -242,6 +215,35 @@
</p>
</dd>
</TMPL_IF>
+<TMPL_IF NAME="W16">
+ <dt id="W16">No DOCTYPE Found! Falling Back to
+ <TMPL_VAR NAME="W16_dtd" ESCAPE="HTML">.</dt>
+ <dd>
+ <p>
+ A DOCTYPE Declaration is mandatory for most current markup languages
+ and without one it is impossible to reliably validate this document.
+ I am falling back to "<TMPL_VAR NAME="W16_dtd" ESCAPE="HTML">" and will
+ attempt to validate the document anyway, but this is very likely to
+ produce spurious error messages for most non-trivial documents.
+ </p>
+ <TMPL_IF NAME="opt_verbose">
+ <TMPL_INCLUDE NAME="doctype_spiel.tmpl">
+ <p>
+ The W3C QA Activity maintains a <a
+ href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html">List of
+ Valid Doctypes</a> that you can choose from, and the <acronym
+ title="Web Design Group">WDG</acronym> maintains a document on
+ "<a href="http://htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/doctype.html">Choosing
+ a DOCTYPE</a>".
+ </p>
+ <TMPL_ELSE>
+ <p>
+ So what should I do?
+ <a href="docs/help.html#faq-doctype">Tell me more...</a>
+ </p>
+ </TMPL_IF>
+ </dd>
+</TMPL_IF>
<TMPL_IF NAME="W17">
<dt id="W17">No Character Encoding detected!</dt>
<dd>
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2005 17:03:02 UTC