- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 06:27:38 +0000
- To: www-validator-cvs@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1828 ------- Additional Comments From ot@w3.org 2005-08-02 06:27 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > See, the source code that I viewed in the validator's results is completely > missing an entire array of <option> form elements that are present post- > processing. The validator is only showing the source it received. If, for some reason, your server did not send the same document it serves e.g browsers, it's your server's faul, not the validator's. > Also, the validator is suggesting that the respective closing > </select> tag is not present as well You probably misread the validator's error here (although, since you are not giving a URI, it's hard to tell). Most likely the validator said "there should be a </select> here and there isn't". This is very different. > I tried it in both the current version of the checker and the new, beta > version and the new beta version did yield only one failed validation, as > opposed to the 26 the current one had yielded. The difference in error numbers can have many causes, very likely irrelevant to your bug report. Just check whether both versions show the same source when you check the "show source box.
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2005 06:27:44 UTC